|
![]() MESSAGES, TRIBUTES AND COMMENTS page 1::page 2::page 3::page 4::page 5::page 6::page 7::page 8::page 9::page 10::page 11::page 12::page 13::page 14::page 15::page 16::page 17::page 18::page 19
I still remember witnessing when he was asked if he was a real doctor, he simply replied, "No, not a real doctor!" May Dr. Clowney's zeal and love for Christ and His Gospel exemplified by him and impressed in so many continue to prosper for the Lamb's glory. Thank you for your kindness and humility.
I am truly indebted to Dr. Clowney's teachings on preaching, church, and pastoral ministry that provide shape and structure to my own ministry at Agape Presbyterian Church in Washington. I pray and hope that his legacy will continue to be an effective and encouraging witness of Christ Jesus our Lord.
But most of all I recall how he was able to keep us focussed on the intent of Scripture, the glory of Christ. Biblical Theology and Redemptive-historical preaching seemed to be new to most of us as seminary students, yet Dr. Clowney guided us without compromising our Reformed convictions. I am thankful for God's witness through Dr. Clowney. We will keep you, Mrs. Clowney, in our prayers.
At a retreat, at which Mrs. Clowney was in attendance also, my family had the great priviledge of meeting the Clowneys. I'm especially happy that Dr. Clowney met my daughter Deborah Ann. At one of the lunches, he presented Debi with a sketch of a bunny rabbit he had seen outside of his cabin. She loved it and kept it in her room. She is now in heaven having passed in October 2004 at the tender age of 11. Though I'm very sad that Dr. Clowney is not with us, I am happy that he is with my daughter in the presence of our Lord. I'm sorry that I won't be able to attend the services, but our prayers and thoughts are with you all.
On behalf of all of us at Reformed Theological Seminary, I would like to express to the family and friends of Ed Clowney, how much we feel his loss because of the positive impact and influence he had on us. There are many RTS faculty who were students under Ed or colleagues with him in theological education at Westminster Seminary. In addition Ed taught courses at RTS on a number of occasions. All in the Reformed movement in our day, even those who did not study under Ed directly or know him personally, have been influenced at least indirectly by Ed’s faithful commitment to the inerrancy of Scripture, to the Reformed confessional standards, and to the centrality of Christ. We rejoice that Ed has finished the race faithfully and is experiencing even more deeply the fullness of the grace of our Lord. May that same grace strengthen others to become giants of the faith in our day. Robert C. (Ric) Cannada, Jr., Chancellor and CEO Reformed Theological Seminary
**** I learned the “Clowney Triangle” when I was at Westminster Seminary. Essentially, it’s a Hermenutical grid – "How do I understand the text in front of me?" Step one: Answer the question as best you can “What did the text mean to it’s original audience?” This gets to immediate context and the sitz im leben issues. This first question puts us into a place where we hear the text speaking clearly to its readers. This is the reason for understanding orginal languages and cultural background, not so that we can impress others, but so we can hear. Step two: "How is this text understood in the flow of redemptive history?" Now we move the context question to encompass all of scripture and redemptive history with the eye on how this text advances the story of grace. This keeps us from isolating a text from the whole story or from narrowing the grand story of redemption down too narrowly. Step three is “How does this text tell me about Jesus – the cross and resurrection?” This is the gospel question – how is this good news? No exegesis is complete without it being focused on the person and work of Christ (Luke 24:13-35). Step four is finally the "us" question “How then does this text speak to us?” This question is often asked too early. It needs to wait until the other three steps have been completed. This is the reason I call it a square is because of the 4 points that must be made to move to the application. Most aberrant exegesis can be traced to skipping one or more of the four steps (e.g. To move from step 1 to step 4 is moralism – just do it. To move from 1 to 3 is mysticism – Jesus without a context, etc.). **** While I never met Dr. Clowney, he influences me every week as I preach, talk and seek to embody the amazingly good news of a holy and merciful God in a city far from a knowledge of such Grace.
|